Whoshotjimmi, I was purely looking at it, by comparing the two airlines against each other.
I was also looking at the route on a basis of passengers travelling LGW-LBA-LGW not just LBA-LGW-LBA. This would be available through easyJet's huge network at London Gatwick. Not only is it easyJet's largest base, but they operate 90+ routes from there, compared with FlyBe's 10, give or take a few, routes.
EasyJet's dominance at London Gatwick lead me to believe that they would be a lot more suitable on the route from LBA and also that they would be able to make it work without having to base an aircraft at LBA, which pushed FlyBe's costs through the roof!
I think it's fair to say that easyJet have a lot more of a flexible fleet that FlyBe. FlyBe are still at the stage where they need to find huge growth, easyJet have already got that. I don't think that FlyBe's 57 seated aircraft was an ideal aircraft to operate on such a route either. FlyBe had onward connecting passengers through code-share agreements with; BMI, Virgin etc. but how many ordinary passengers knew this.....?
I think that easyJet would also have the ability to attract, not just business passengers but also leisure and onward connecting passengers.
We saw CMJ write that onward connections may be 'at your own risk', I personally would trust easyJet a lot more that FlyBe, if I were to meet another flight.