I'm going to assume the above is a ChatGPT
I apologize for my rant.Had a bad night.😂
However
Birmingham to Pakistan route is a significant commercial corridor for
Birmingham airport (BHX)
, driven by strong demand from the West Midlands' large British Pakistani community. In the past, the introduction of direct flights to India and Pakistan has been credited with fuelling a major increase in the airport's Asian growth sector.
Route Overview
- High Demand: The route has a significant passenger volume, with an estimated 362,000 people from the region traveling to Islamabad alone annually (prior to direct flights being established in Manchester).
- Economic Impact: The strong demand from the South Asian diaspora in the West Midlands makes this route a vital part of the airport's long-haul network and overall economic contribution to the region.
- Connectivity: Major airlines like Pakistan international airlines,Saudia,Turkish airlines and Emirates, and Qatar Airways operate connecting flights to various Pakistani cities including Islamabad, Lahore, and Karachi.
- Direct Flights: While direct flights have operated in the past (e.g., by Air Blue and PIA), currently there are generally no non-stop options available from Birmingham to Pakistan, and all flights involve at least one stop.
- but direct return flights from Birmingham to Pakistan generally cost between £500 and £900 when they were in operation.
- Typical Price Range: Reports from when direct services were available (or were being estimated for reintroduction) often cited fares in the region of £600 to £800 for a standard return economy ticket.
- Peak Season Prices: During high-demand periods like the summer holidays (July) or December, prices for direct flights could easily exceed £1,000.
I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make with this ChatGPT analysis. As far as I can tell, no one is questioning whether there is demand or a market for flights between BHX and ISB — that much is a given.
You seem to be suggesting, however, that BHX has somehow shot itself in the foot, despite offering no evidence that the airport’s actions have negatively impacted the chances of this route being relaunched.
You also don’t appear to recognise the difference between demand and supply. Yes, there is demand for travel between BHX and ISB, but is that demand already being met by the existing supply from current carriers?
Having picked a random week in November 2026 and searched for flights between BHX and ISB, there are 71 one-stop flight options across four airlines: Emirates, Qatar Airways, Turkish Airlines, and Saudia. Prices range from £750–£850 return, and around 25 of those flights are under 15 hours in duration.
Emirates, Qatar Airways, Turkish Airlines, and Saudia are award-winning airlines with excellent reputations for product quality, service, on-time performance, and safety.
Now let’s assume PIA were to launch flights between BHX and ISB three times weekly (assuming they even have the aircraft available). Using MAN–ISB as a comparison, baseline fares are around £710 return. These flights would likely be operated by aircraft two to three times older than those used by competing airlines, with poorer service, lower food quality, and a higher likelihood of delays. While there would certainly be a market for passengers wanting a direct flight from BHX to ISB, the vast majority would likely be happy to pay an extra £40–£50 to fly with a much better airline.
To be clear, I’m not saying I wouldn’t support PIA relaunching direct flights between BHX and ISB. However, I seriously question how many passengers would choose them voluntarily — and whether that would be enough to make the route viable. I would much rather see PIA re-establish themselves successfully on ISB–MAN and ISB–LHR, iron out their operational issues, and demonstrate consistency. If they can sustain those routes for 12–18 months, I’d be happy to welcome them back to BHX. Until then, PIA remain something of a loose cannon and have yet to prove they can deliver a dependable, reliable, safe, and high-quality service.