Further to my previous post and replying to a few others all in one here so please excuse brevity.
If I/You were operating an airline and your product was seemingly competing directly against someone else's who had superior support from the airport in terms of hard cash, marketing and whatever else is part of a deal, then wouldn't it get your back up ? It certainly would get mine highly raised, and therefore EI's actions here if at all related to that are highly sympathised. There was too much capacity on the route and I'm with Local on the fact that I also believe if one of these carriers was FR then we'd be fine, FR seems pretty much self sufficient these days.
However, in this whole Flybe deal, that's now two airlines who have got the hump, CityJet (who of course now operate SSJ's which would have been a marvelous fit at CWL for numerous routes), and now EI, a long-serving, relatively good quality, well known brand has been effectively forced off the route with one of the factors, probably a big factor too is unequal and unfair competition.
Whilst we all support the fact that BE have the wealth of routes that they have here, CWL and the WG have set, in my opinion, a very very dangerous and precarious precedent here with BE, and for that reason can we honestly see anyone else taking up DUB or any other route where they would be in direct competition with a subsidised competitor ?
This news may be music to the ears of FR since rumours have been rife over the harps moving in for the last few months, but after this deal with BE, then i'm sure the FR i know rather well, and any other future incumbent airlines will want a similar deal.
My guess is that this situation can go two ways, it dangles the ever increasingly sized carrot for FR or the likes at CWL, or no new carrier will be found for DUB at all. I'm going with the latter for now, subject to change.