I seriously doubt it, in an email Mr Kehoe commented that EDI paying airlines to fly there was unsustainable and not something BHX could or would do and they are not exactly known for offering great deals to airlines
See, I don't buy that. What bosses say in public and what they do in private can be 2 very different things.
I remember Keith Williams saying that BA would not be competing directly with the low cost airlines, as they know passengers appreciate BA for their 'all included' approach. Just 3 weeks later, BA introduced a 'basic' fare with no baggage included.
KLM were another one. 'We have no intention of pulling our Liverpool flights', a mere 16 hours before, erm, pulling Liverpool flights!
I still firmly believe BHX offered a zero charge fee to try and entice Biman (or more specifically Kevin Steele, given the Biman board were less than enthused about serving BHX).
Then there were the times when BHX had to 'start again' with previous Air India negotiations, due to the CEO resigning. Why would they have to 'go back to the drawing board' if the deal was with the airline, not a specific person.
Either there were some deals being offered, or, if the 2 CEO's of the 2 airlines were that pivotal to negotiations, then something far more shady was being done. (given that in the vast majority of large airlines, including those of state run airlines, d CEOs rarely take part in route negotiations, that's what the routes team do).
If they were to pay someone to open up a route purely for 'prestige' I'm sure there would be many more airlines above AI on the list
It all depends, who took the bite for the short term gain, and who actually sat down and thought 'no, I just don't see it working when the money dries up'. Some airlines see more sense than money. They would rather keep their reputation.